文章摘要
范式转换与批评史学科重构——试探以关键词为纲撰写“中国文学批评史”
Paradigm Transformation and Discipline Reconstruction of Criticism History: Writing “The History of Chinese Literary Criticism” with the Keywords as the Key Link
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 中国文学批评史  关键词  学科建构  范式转换
英文关键词: discipline construction  paradigm transformation
基金项目:“湖南省普通高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地——中国古代文学与文化基地”项目([湘教通(2004)284号]);2012年湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(湘哲社领[2012]14号);湖南省教育厅科研项目(13C299)
作者单位
胡红梅1,2,胡晓林3 1.湖南科技大学 人文学院湖南 湘潭 4112012.武汉大学 文学院湖北 武汉 4300723.湘潭职业技术学校 英语教研组湖南 湘潭 411228 
摘要点击次数: 1198
全文下载次数: 966
中文摘要:
      传统的“中国文学批评史”大多以时间为线索对过去的文学批评进行梳理,以体现撰史者的社会立场、文化观念和审美趣味。在新世纪的文论生态下,“中国文学批评史”的撰写应突破传统的著述体例,借鉴雷蒙·威廉斯开创的以阐释核心术语来反思学科建设和发展的“关键词批评”的研究范式,以理性思考学科性质为始基、以对学科发展的全景扫描为门径、以勾稽爬梳关键词为中轴来探索以关键词为纲重新撰写中国文学批评史的必要性与可能性。这样,能从整体上把握中国文学批评史的理论精髓和逻辑演进脉络,从而促进当代中国文学批评史及其范畴体系的转型与重构。
英文摘要:
      Most of the traditional “history of Chinese literary criticism” combed the past literary criticism chronologically, in order to reflect the writers social position, culture idea and aesthetic interest. In the new centurys literary ecology, the writing of “history of Chinese literary criticism” should break through the traditional writing style, and fully make use of Raymond Williams research paradigm by explaining the core terms to reflect on the discipline construction and development of “keywords criticism”. With the rational thinking on disciplinary nature as the primordium, with the panoramic scanning of discipline development as the source, and with the keywords sorting as the axis, it explores to the necessity and the possibility of writing the history of Chinese literary criticism with keywords as the key link. Only in this way can we, on the whole, grasp the theoretical essence and the logical evolution of the history of Chinese literary criticism, so as to promote the transformation and the reconstruction of contemporary history of Chinese literary criticism and its category system. Key words: history of Chinese literary criticism;
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭