文章摘要
腐败犯罪瑕疵证据与非法证据的界分标准
On Distinguishing Norms of Corruption Crime inDefective Evidence and Illegal Evidence
  
DOI:
中文关键词: :腐败犯罪  瑕疵证据  非法证据  界分标准
英文关键词: 
基金项目:安徽大学廉政法治协同创新中心2014年度研究生创新课题(ADLZFZ14YC01)
作者单位
曹红军1,王迎2 1.安徽大学 法学院安徽 合肥 2306012.招商银行 淮南分行安徽 淮南 232002 
摘要点击次数: 568
全文下载次数: 
中文摘要:
      治化反腐和冤假错案防范的有效实现,需要审判人员对腐败犯罪事实证据的精准审查。通过对腐败犯罪案件中瑕疵证据和非法证据的类型分析,提出“程序违法程度、证据的客观性和程序正义”作为腐败犯罪非法证据和瑕疵证据的界分标准。从而对非法言词证据、非法物证、书证以及瑕疵证据适用不同的排除规则,为有效实现法治化反腐的目标提供参考依据。
英文摘要:
      In order to combat corruption by rule of law and prevent miscarriages of justice, it is required that the judges review the crime evidence of corruption precisely. Based on the analysis of the corruption crime types, this paper proposes the distinguishing norms of corruption crime in defective evidence and illegal evidence, i.e. “the degree of procedure violation, the objectivity of evidence and the procedural justice”. Thus, the illegally testimonial evidence, the illegal material evidence, the illegal documentary evidence and the defective evidence is applicable to differently exclusionary rules, so as to provide references for effective realization of the goals of anti-corruption by rule of law.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭